On Sunday, September 2, 2012 12:59:54 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
> On 9/2/2012 5:01 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> On Saturday, September 1, 2012 12:43:50 PM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
>> *Where is the revulsion, disgust, and blame - the stigma and
>> shaming...the deep and violent prejudices? Surely they are not found in the
>> banal evils of game theory. ** *
>> In the book I referred, it is described the evolutionary role of
>> sentiments. Sentiments are the result of mostly unconscious processing. See
>> for example the cheating detection mechanism in this book, which has been
>> subject to an extensive set of test. and there are many papers about
>> cheater detection. cheater detection is a module of logical reasoning
>> specialized for situations where a deal can be broken. It exist because
>> cheater detection is critical in some situations and it must necessary to
>> react quickly. Its effect is perceived by the conscious as anger of fear,
>> depending on the situation.
> That's not the point. It doesn't matter how tightly the incidence of
> sentiment or emotion is bound with evolutionary function, I would expect
> that given the fact of emotion's existence. The problem that needs to be
> answered is given a universe of nothing but evolutionary functions, why
> would or how could anything like an emotion arise?
> When an amoeba detects a gradient of salinity and moves in the less saline
> direction does it have a feeling?
I imagine that it does. Not much like a feeling we could relate to as human
beings, but there is an experience there and it has more qualitative depth
to it than when a steel needle interacts with a gradient of salinity, but
less depth than when an animal's tongue encounters salinity.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at