On 9/5/2012 12:47 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/4/2012 9:37 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
In Craig's defense. When did ontological considerations become a
matter of contingency? You cannot "Choose" what is Real!
But you choose what is real in your theory of the world. Then you see
how well your theory measures up. The Standard Model is a theory of
energy and matter that has passed thousands of empirical tests to very
high accuracy. Its ontology is elementary particles. It replaced a
lot of other theories that had different ontologies.
Sure, we do chose our theories, but we don't get to chose the
facts. I am just looking at what may be down the road. ;-)
That is the entire point of Reality. It is not up to the choice of
any one. It is that which is incontrovertible for All of us. The Moon
does not vanish when you stop looking at it, simply because you're
not its only onlooker!
So you think somebody has to be looking at the Moon for it to exist?
No. Existence is necessary possibility. It is not contingent. The
specifics of observed properties, that is another story. Existence is
not dependent on us; what we measure, is.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at