On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:20:49 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > > Look how lawful and rich a very simple program, less than 1K, can define: >
Statistically, shouldn't we see this simple 1K sequence frequently in nature? I mean precisely. Shouldn't there be hundreds of species of beetle that have patterns on their backs which are derived exclusively from the Mandelbot set. Also, having heard Mandelbrot as audio data instead of visual, I can say that the impact of the experience is diminished by orders of magnitude. It may only be visual sense that makes something as meaningless and recursive as Mandelbrot look interesting to us. Craig > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/GqxsilAo_mkJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
