There are different kinds of beliefs. The believer that has no strong evidences, know that he believe. He know that he believe.
The second kind of believer does not know that he believe, because he live in a environment where the evidences are uncontested in the environment where he lives. For example a islamic comunity may find unthinkable that the Koran is not truth word by word. In the same way, positivists 100 years ago could find unthinkable to question the law of newtonian gravitation or the superiority of the white race according with the anthropological scientists of his time. These second kind of believers are the true believers. "Science" is a doxastic concept. it is too imprecise to be used in a serious talk about philosophical concepts, such is the concept of truth. If you mean science as the scientific method by the criteria of falsabilty, then science is not a criterium of truth, but a criterium of non-truth. Not even that, because it does not states what is non-truth now. Simply, is a method to decide it in the future if we follow that method, and this is not guaranteed, because it is simply a method. It is not a criteria. Therefore, true science is perpetual scepticism. A follower of the scientific method can not even discard that the myth of the virgin Mary is true. On the contrary, positivism, or scientism, is a perversion around the institution of science. It is a belief system of the second kind. Its founder, Auguste Compte wanted it to be a state-promoted religion. And it is. 2012/9/14 Stathis Papaioannou <stath...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Alberto G. Corona <agocor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I suppose that you mean that there are histories that everyone would >> identify as bullshit. Well, this changes nothing. A myth by definition >> is something believed by a group of people in the past. Most of them >> as intelligent or more that you and me . You and me believe in things >> that will be myths tomorrow. Most of them created by scientists. The >> mith of antropogenic global warming, the myth of cultural determinism >> for example.. There are many things that were "scientific" in the past >> "race studies" for example. Now there are "gender studies"... they >> were, and they are scientific and bullshit at the same time. I hope >> that this is clarifying. > > Global warming may turn out to be wrong, but it is not a myth. It is > based on evidence and the evidence is debated. The virgin birth of > Jesus, however, is completely different. It is not based on any > evidence, because it is a matter of "faith". Believers are actually > proud of the fact that they have no evidence for it, will not change > their mind (even in principle) if evidence against it arises, and > there is hence no point arguing with them. Even worse, believers are > inconsistent: they will dismiss other peoples' equivalent > evidence-free beliefs as bullshit without a second thought. > > > -- > Stathis Papaioannou > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.