On 10/11/2012 1:14 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:28 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    > It's [free will] a simple enough concept

I think that's true, although I may be using a somewhat different meaning of the word "simple" than you are.

    > that it is used in law courts


    >a venue not noted for metaphysical sophistication

Astronomically true!!

    > "Free" is the contrary of "coerced".

But I don't know what "coerced will" means either.

So you see no reason to draw a legal distinction between a banker to takes money from his bank to support a more lavish life style and one who does it to keep a bank robber from shooting him?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to