On 10/25/2012 11:13 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
If you're going to explain purpose, meaning, qualia, thoughts,...you
need to start from something simpler that does not assume those
things. Bruno proposes to explain matter as well, so he has to
start without matter.
Actually I deduce the absence of matter from comp. If we bet on comp,
we have no other choice than to explain matter from dream coherence
notions. We can add matter, but it would be like invisible horses, and
vision is a first person experience and it relies on the infinities of
computation in arithmetic.
No, matter would not be "like invisible horses". It quantifies the
"resources" required for a computation to run. You safely neglect this
in your explanations because you set COMP in the platonic realm of
ideas, where time, space and limitations do not exist. I am trying to
get your result to work in conditions that cannot ignore resource
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at