On 10/27/2012 10:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Oct 2012, at 20:30, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/26/2012 8:44 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Dear Bruno and Alberto,
I agree some what with both of you. As to the idea of a "genetic
algorithm can isolate anticipative programs", I think that anticipation
is the analogue of inertia for computations, as Mach saw inertia. It is
a relation between any one and the class of computations that it
to such that any incomplete string has a completion in the collections
of others like it. This is like an error correction or compression
ROGER: For what it's worth--- like Mach's inertia, each monad
mirrors the rest of the universe.
Yes, but the idea is that the mirroring that each monad does of
each other's "percepts" (not the universe per se!) is not an exact
isomorphism between the monads. There has to be a difference between
monads or else there is only One.
Right, and in the arithmetical Indra Net, all universal numbers are
And the, by the first person indeterminacy it is like there is a
competition between all of them to bring your most probable next
"instant of life". It looks that, at least on the sharable part, there
are big winners, like this or that quantum hamiltonian. But we have to
explain them through the arithmetical Net structure, if we want
separate properly the quanta from the qualia.
A slightly technical question. In the arithmetic IndraNet idea,
what plays the role of the "surface" that is reflective? How do we get
the numbers to appear separated from each other? This seems necessary
for the appearance of physical space.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at