Hi Stephen P. King
Contingent truths (facts) are not always true.
They are constructed by inference or induction by
man (a la Francis Bacon). Quantities are such.
Necessary truths are/were/shall be always true. They can't be invented,
they have to be discovered. Numbers are such.
Arithmetic or had to exist before man or
the Big Bang woujld not have worked.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: Stephen P. King
Time: 2012-11-03, 08:06:59
Subject: Re: On the ontological status of elementary arithmetic
On 11/3/2012 6:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
No, that cannot be the case since statements do not even exist if the
framework or theory that defines them does not exist, therefore there is not
'truth' for a non-exitence entity.
Brent already debunked this. The truth of a statement does not need the
existence of the statement. You confuse again the truth of 1+1=2, with a
possible claim of that truth, like "1+1=2".
Horsefeathers! How is the truth of an arithmetic statement separable from
any claim of that truth? What is the possible value of a statement that we can
make no claims about?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at