Hi Stephen P. King Yes, I had forgotten about many 1p.
And your dismissal of the possibility of a private language is exactly what Witgenstein concluded. Great minds must think alike. Roger Clough, [email protected] 11/5/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-05, 11:18:48 Subject: Re: Can there be a private language ? On 11/5/2012 10:40 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > Hi Stephen P. King > > You could see it that way, but I only meant that 1p is subjective > (as I see or know it (here,now)) while 3p is objective (as they > see or know whatever, whenever). Hi Roger, OK, but isn't the "objectivity" of 3p exactly what many 1p could agree upon and nothing more? > > Which raises Wittgenstein's question, "Can there be a > private language ?" No, because a language is a conversion of the signification of some set of signs between many communicators. -- Onward! Stephen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
