Hi Stephen P. King  

Yes, I had forgotten about many 1p. 

And your dismissal of the possibility of a private language
is exactly what Witgenstein concluded.

Great minds must think alike.



Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
11/5/2012  
"Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen 


----- Receiving the following content -----  
From: Stephen P. King  
Receiver: everything-list  
Time: 2012-11-05, 11:18:48 
Subject: Re: Can there be a private language ? 


On 11/5/2012 10:40 AM, Roger Clough wrote: 
> Hi Stephen P. King 
> 
> You could see it that way, but I only meant that 1p is subjective 
> (as I see or know it (here,now)) while 3p is objective (as they 
> see or know whatever, whenever). 

Hi Roger, 

     OK, but isn't the "objectivity" of 3p exactly what many 1p could  
agree upon and nothing more? 

> 
> Which raises Wittgenstein's question, "Can there be a 
> private language ?" 
     No, because a language is a conversion of the signification of some  
set of signs between many communicators. 

--  
Onward! 

Stephen 


--  
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group. 
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. 
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. 
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to