2012/12/13 meekerdb <[email protected]> > On 12/13/2012 10:46 AM, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Copenhagen said the choice is made by the experimenter and apparently >> Deutsch agrees with this because he thinks it's significant that his AI is >> conscious > > > No Deutsch does not agree with this, I know because I've talked to him > about it. In the many worlds interpretation neither choice nor > consciousness nor mind in general have anything to do with the way the laws > of physics work, however in order to devise a experiment that attempts to > prove that Many Worlds makes better predictions than other interpretations > where mind is important it is obviously necessary to incorporate mind into > the experiment. > > > Which agrees with my point that the experiment is only designed to test > the Wigner theory that consciousness collapses the wave-function. > Rejecting Wigner's interpretation (which he dropped later anyway) is not > the same as proving MWI. > > Brent >
Isn't that prove wrong any collapse explanations ? Quentin > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
