On 22 Dec 2012, at 22:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/22/2012 11:56 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
Deutsch et al. have solved the probability problem.
I don't think so. If you are referring to his decision analysis, it
only seems to work for simple binary choices - QM predicts
probabilities that are often irrational numbers. Gleason's theorem
goes part way but it depends on solving the einselection problem.
So, is it not that everything is solved with both Gleason theorem
(measure) and MW+comp (einselection)?
Except the mind-body problem, of course, which needs to generalize
both MW and Gleason on arithmetic, but the logic of self-reference
already shows the shadow of a "Gleason theorem" for arithmetic and its
inside views.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
