We make inferences from the data list which make sense to us intuitively, logically, aesthetically, and continue to coincide without experience practically. Then eventually we understand more and recontextualize what we thought was 'law' into more of a 'really nice try', but by then 'we' aren't the same people as we were before. I would wager that this pattern turns out to be more of a 'law' than what we have learned from science, philosophy, or religion. Craig > Brent > > > For example a good short talk in this respect > > > > Where do the Laws of Nature Come From? (Bas van Fraassen) > > > http://www.closertotruth.com/video-profile/Where-do-the-Laws-of-Nature-Come-From-Bas-van-Fraassen-/1372 > > > > > > > Evgenii > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.