On 4/21/2013 1:06 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:44 AM, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be
>> do you believe there is a small china teapot in orbit around the
Uranus? There is not a scrap of evidence indicating the existence
of such a
teapot nor is there anything proving its nonexistence, so are you a
atheist or a teapot agnostic? Personally I'm willing to get off the
and say I am a teapot atheist.
> As a scientist, I can only be a teapot agnostic. From current
would say that the teapot theory is rather implausible.
And I would say that if there is no evidence for or against a theory that
mean there is a 50% chance it is correct, and if I judge that the theory
implausible it does not warrant ware and tear on valuable brain cells with
thought about it then I would call myself a teapot atheist without apology.
>>> Atheism which is a variant of Christianism
>> And 2+2= 5 for extremely large values of 2.
> Atheism use the conception of God given by people using authoritative
argument, and dismiss the talk of both the rationalist and the mystics.
like the fundamentalist
Well OK, if you radically redefine the word "God"
When atheists say they don't believe in God, to which religion(s)'s God do they
A theist god: One who is a person, wants to be worshipped, is benevolent and powerful,
sometimes answers prayers, defines morals and judges people after dearth.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.