On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:44 AM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> do you believe there is a small china teapot in orbit around the planet >>> Uranus? There is not a scrap of evidence indicating the existence of such a >>> teapot nor is there anything proving its nonexistence, so are you a teapot >>> atheist or a teapot agnostic? Personally I'm willing to get off the fence >>> and say I am a teapot atheist. >>> >> >> > As a scientist, I can only be a teapot agnostic. From current >> information I would say that the teapot theory is rather implausible. >> > > And I would say that if there is no evidence for or against a theory that > does not mean there is a 50% chance it is correct, and if I judge that the > theory was so implausible it does not warrant ware and tear on valuable > brain cells with one more thought about it then I would call myself a > teapot atheist without apology. > > >>> Atheism which is a variant of Christianism >>> >>> >>> >> And 2+2= 5 for extremely large values of 2. >>> >> >> > Atheism use the conception of God given by people using authoritative >> argument, and dismiss the talk of both the rationalist and the mystics. >> That's like the fundamentalist >> > > Well OK, if you radically redefine the word "God" > When atheists say they don't believe in God, to which religion(s)'s God do they refer? Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
