On 10/8/2013 9:05 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> You are spitting non-sense... that's not what is asked. He will do *both*
from a
3rd POV.... but each Bruno can only live *ONE* stream of consciousness
which is
*either* M or W, it's not both. So before duplication, the probability (or
measure
of you prefer) is 50/50 for the destinations from the POV if the guy
standing in H.
*IT'S THE SAME THING IN MWI SETTING AND I DON'T HEAR YOU CRYING NONSENSE
ABOUT IT ON
EVERY POST*. Be consistant and reject MWI as an obvious BS crap.
And You are mixing apples and oranges and bananas:
*Quantum Mechanics is about finding a probability that works better than random guessing
in predicting if a event will be seen.
*Many Worlds is a theory that explains why Quantum Mechanics works as well as it does
that some think (including me) is a little (but only a little) less odd than competing
explanations.
How do you explain quantum mechanical probabilities in the Many Worlds
interpretation?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
