On 9 October 2013 06:19, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 10/8/2013 9:05 AM, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > You are spitting non-sense... that's not what is asked. He will do
>> *both* from a 3rd POV.... but each Bruno can only live *ONE* stream of
>> consciousness which is *either* M or W, it's not both. So before
>> duplication, the probability (or measure of you prefer) is 50/50 for the
>> destinations from the POV if the guy standing in H. *IT'S THE SAME THING IN
>> MWI SETTING AND I DON'T HEAR YOU CRYING NONSENSE ABOUT IT ON EVERY POST*.
>> Be consistant and reject MWI as an obvious BS crap.
> And You are mixing apples and oranges and bananas:
> *Quantum Mechanics is about finding a probability that works better than
> random guessing in predicting if a event will be seen.
> *Many Worlds is a theory that explains why Quantum Mechanics works as well
> as it does that some think (including me) is a little (but only a little)
> less odd than competing explanations.
> How do you explain quantum mechanical probabilities in the Many Worlds
That is the $64000 question! But surely it also equally applies to other
interpretations, e.g. Copenhagen has an infinity of values to select from,
so how do you get the Born rule there? (for example).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.