On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:56 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:

>  On 10/18/2013 1:38 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>   On 10/18/2013 12:26 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:03 PM*, meekerdb <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  On 10/17/2013 6:04 PM, LizR wrote:
>>>
>>>  On 18 October 2013 13:42, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  The basis problem is no different from the "present" problem under
>>>> special relativity: If we exist in many times across space time, why do we
>>>> find ourselves in this particular "now"?
>>>>
>>>>    I don't know about the basis problem, but the now problem is simple
>>> to solve - we don't find ourselves in a particular now, find ourselves in
>>> all the nows.
>>>
>>>
>>>  But *I *don't find myself in all the nows.  Why not?
>>>
>>
>>  I've highlighted the answer for you.  Why should anyone (including you)
>> take the word of one particular Brent from one particular time, that other
>> Brents do not find themselves in other times?
>>
>>
>>>   Note that in some basis I *am* in a superposition.
>>>
>>
>>  How does the theory of mind you are operating under predict what being
>> in a superposition should feel like?
>>
>>
>>  First, my theory of mind makes mind dependent on classical processes in
>> a physical brain - so it explains why experiences are of the classical.
>>
>
>  Okay.
>
>
>>  But Bruno's theory takes experience as logically prior to the physical.
>> So he can't appeal to the physical aspects of the brain to make experience
>> classical.
>>
>
>  He assumes this when he says our consciousness is supported by a Turing
> emulable process.  Turing machines are classical.
>
>
>>
>> Second, you and I are in superpositions relative to some bases.  So how
>> does it feel?
>>
>>
>  Let me make sure I understand the question.  Let us say we are in a
> metal box (like Schrodinger's cat), and we measure the spin state of some
> electron's y-axis. Outside of this box, there is an observer, and from his
> perspective, we within the box remain in a super position of having
> measured both states.  You are asking what it feels like to the person
> inside the box in the superposition, from the perspective of the person
> outside the box?
>
>  If so, I think the answer is rather clear.  It doesn't matter what the
> person outside the box thinks, within the box the electron's spin is no
> longer in the superposition, and neither is the person who measured it.
> Their experiences have diverged. From the perspective of the person outside
> the box, they know that the person inside will be performing the
> measurement and has split.  Had they known the entire state of the wave
> function within the box, they could predict it is now in a superposition
> where one observer has measured and written down "spin is up", and the
> other where the observer has written "spin is down", but even from the
> perspective of this external observer, he does not find any state in the
> evolved wavefunction of the box where the two observers have some kind of
> shared memory of seeing both states.
>
>
> That's a Copenhagen description in which superpositions are destroyed
> instead of just being dispersed into the enivronment.
>

Is that still the case is the box is completely isolated from the outside
environment, such that the superposition can remain within the box from the
perspective of those outside?



> If you take MWI seriously the whole system (including the observers) are
> in superpositions and to say that the observers see either "spin-up" or
> "spin-down" is assuming that there is some projection operator that neatly
> separates the superpositions in that basis.
>

Can't the whole superposition of the entire universe simply exist?  Why do
we need to indicate some particular basis?  What purpose does the
"projection operator" serve?



> But to say that is the preferred basis is to beg the question.  Not
> begging the question is "the basis problem".
>

What is the basis problem?

Thanks,

Jason

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to