On 12/23/2013 11:33 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/12/23 meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>>
On 12/23/2013 10:55 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/12/23 Edgar L. Owen <edgaro...@att.net <mailto:edgaro...@att.net>>
The question of whether God exists is meaningless without first giving
definition of what is meant by God, of how God is defined. Otherwise
is talking about different things and nothing will go anywhere.
If you need a God there is only one possible rational definition and
that is to
just define God as the universe itself. First there is now absolute
that God does exist
Well no... It is certain that I experience a reality but that there exists a
consistent physical universe defined everywhere is not certain...
Is your experience consistent, i.e. describable without contradictions?
how you conceive it is your model of reality and the universe. If it
things independent of your thoughts external to you, and other people that
these things, then that's the physics of it. Whether it's 'defined
would depend on your model.
I agree but any model is *far* from certainty... so defining "God" as meaning the
universe doesn't settle at all that it exists...
I agree. In fact it tends to drag a lot of bronze age tribal baggage into scientific
questions - which is why I wish Bruno would stop casually using religious metaphors.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.