On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Richard Ruquist <yann...@gmail.com> wrote:

##
Advertising

> an experiment has been proposed that tests Wheeler's theory
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3328
>
The Pusey, Barrett, Rudolph paper (PBR) never mentions Wheeler and it only
deals with realistic theories, Wheeler's is non-realistic. PBR says that if
the quantum state of something is not real and just represents what a
observer can know about it "then experimental predictions are obtained
which contradict those of quantum theory".
This is interesting however to derive it they have to assume realism:
"The argument depends on a few assumptions. One is that a system has a
"real physical state" not necessarily completely described by quantum
theory, but objective and independent of the observer."
PBR assumes realism but Wheeler does not; in Wheeler's theory nothing is
independent of the observer, and even the PBR paper admits:
"this assumption would be denied by instrumentalist approaches to quantum
theory, wherein the quantum stateis is merely a calculational tool for
making predictions concerning macroscopic measurement outcomes."
> It seems to me that Wheeler's ideas are consistent with MWI
>
I don't see how 2 interpretations of quantum mechanics could be more
inconsistent, they are at opposite ends of the spectrum.
> So you agree with me.
>
Apparently not.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.