Liz,

How do you define infinity differently than an unreachable process?

Edgar



On Monday, January 13, 2014 4:08:52 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
>
> On 14 January 2014 02:32, Edgar L. Owen <edga...@att.net <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> Jason,
>>
>> To answer your questions.
>>
>> Reality must be finite. When the definition of infinity as an unreachable 
>> non-terminable PROCESS (keep adding 1 forever) is clearly understood it is 
>> obvious that nothing actual can be infinite. There is no getting around 
>> this. Nothing real can be infinite....
>>
>
> Circular argument. If you *assume* infinity is the result of a process, 
> then obviously it can't be reached. Please justify that assumption.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to