Liz, How do you define infinity differently than an unreachable process?
Edgar On Monday, January 13, 2014 4:08:52 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote: > > On 14 January 2014 02:32, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote: > >> Jason, >> >> To answer your questions. >> >> Reality must be finite. When the definition of infinity as an unreachable >> non-terminable PROCESS (keep adding 1 forever) is clearly understood it is >> obvious that nothing actual can be infinite. There is no getting around >> this. Nothing real can be infinite.... >> > > Circular argument. If you *assume* infinity is the result of a process, > then obviously it can't be reached. Please justify that assumption. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
