On 1/16/2014 12:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Jan 2014, at 20:44, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/15/2014 12:29 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Jan 2014, at 22:39, LizR wrote:
On 15 January 2014 10:29, Terren Suydam <terren.suy...@gmail.com
condescending dismissal in 3... 2... 1...
Not a condescending /*dismissal*/ in anyone else's mind, however, just more
hand-waving nonsense that only Edgar could possibly think is a dismissal.
This is fun, in a masochistic sort of way, but I am starting to miss discussions with
some real meat in them.
Ahaaaa ... Me too :)
Ready for a bit of (modal) logic? That is needed for the Solovay theorem, exploited
heavily in the AUDA ...
I'd like to know what the existence of non-standard models of arithmetic, especially
the finitist ones, implies for comp?
All non-standard models are infinite. They does not play any direct roles, except for
allowing the consistency of inconsistency. A model which satisfies Bf has to be non
standard. A proof of "false" needs to be an infinite "natural numbers", and it has an
infinity of predecessors (due to the axiom saying that 0 is unique in having no
I think that only refers to non-standard models which add not-G as an axiom where G is the
Godel sentence. What about application of the compactness theorem to produce a
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.