On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 3:05:49 PM UTC+1, [email protected] wrote: > > It is the belief that the scentists can be trusted to do the research > they are supposed to do in a scientifically responsible way, vs. the > belief in the conspiracy theory that the entire scientific field has > been hijacked by ultra left wing environmental pressure groups. > > Saibal > The distinction is more minimal. It's entirely allowable and reasonable to hold the belief you mention above, contingent on the measure of its holding also being reasonable...and consistent across all of science, or else some reasonable explanation why some sciences are so grossly corrupted, it's safer to rely on lobbies with an *actual* and *known* and not denied at that level - just not bothered with - at all, motive that *explicitly* corresponds to that precise definition of corruption being, for whatever arse-ended personal reason, directly in the opposite direction at Science. I mean, come on. What the hell is the point of dismissing one domain for a range of suspected traits, by supported another one exhibiting the same range at a much higher standard of confirmation?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
