On 10 Jun 2014, at 02:55, LizR wrote:
On 10 June 2014 10:13, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/9/2014 2:46 PM, LizR wrote:
I guess I could venture that it's the ontology of any TOE in which
interactions are all 3p.
OK, thanks. So I would guess that it's equivalent to eliminativism,
as I think it's called - the idea that consciousness is an illusion
("albeit a persistent one"). It does seem that way to me.
I don't think it implies eliminativism. There's still temperature
even though we have statistical mechanics. I think there's far
too much importance given to "what's fundamental" and it leads to
calling everything else and illusion. I doubt that Bruno thinks
arithmetic is an illusion just because what's fundamental is 0, S,
+, and *. A correction to this kind of obsession with essence is
why I like my virtuous circle of explanation.
So how can all interactions be 3p? Maybe I misunderstood. It seems
to me that consciousness implies there's 1p stuff going on?
We can hope that indeed!
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
