> On 3 Jul 2014, at 9:09 am, David Nyman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, primary belief, though necessarily incorrigible in the first > instance, is nonetheless vulnerable in the second instance to > correction or reinterpretation. Just as well, really.
But is it? If primary belief (your belief in where the buck stops) were vulnerable to correction then why has Christianity for example, persevered so long without revision or updating of beliefs when say, knowledge of the universe progressed. First impressions seem to count for a lot in forming the patterns of recognition the brain uses. A powerful primary belief in matter seems to be a very difficult thing to have some people admit to. Kim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
