On 7/3/2014 8:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Only a pseudo-scientist would say that the science progresses have put any threat on the non literal reading of any "sacred texts".
Wouldn't that depend on what the non-literal reading is? I think what you mean is that there is always some non-literal reading that is not threatened by science...or by logic, or by empathy, or by anything else you care to name, because "non-literal" is just "not what it says". "Mein Kampf" is also consistent with good race relations, on a non-literal reading.
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
