On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Obviously if duplication is possible then singular pronouns become >>> plural ones in the process. >>> >> >> >> Yes, and yet Bruno still demands to know what one and only one city >> *you* will see. And things are not made clear if Bruno adds " from *the* >> 1P " as if there were only one. >> > > > Quentin is right. You lie. > I always insist that they are two 1p after the duplication. > Then why does Bruno Marchal keep demanding to know what one and only one city *you* (which one?) will see from *the* (unique) 1p? If there are two (and there are) why didn't Bruno Marchal ask what cities John Clark will see from *a* 1p? And since there are clearly two and thus the referent to personal pronouns is ambiguous why does Bruno Marchal continue to use them despite numerous requests to stop? >> after reading Bruno's last few posts John Clark is no longer even sure >> what Bruno means by "The Helsinki Man". >> > > > What we have agree on, but you often change the definition, arguing it > is arbitrary. Once we make the decision, you have to stick on it, even if > the initial decision was arbitrary. Fine, so lets get our terms straight. Is "The Helsinki Man" someone who remembers being a man in Helsinki or is "The Helsinki Man" someone who is currently experiencing Helsinki? I can work with either definition, they are after all arbitrary, but as Bruno Marchal says whatever is decided it is necessary to stick with it. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
