On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:58 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> > emergence->reductionism->fascism wholism->empathy Yeah, I guess you do. > Lol, really Brent? If you read the post without hunting instincts you'll see that implication chain collapse on itself. Nobody claims any of that with the strength you frame. I refuse to play this game where you get to knock down such generalization with partial edited posts, pretending they are held by anybody here in these strong forms, when you appear to needle and provoke the same complex of ambiguous topics over and over; it's almost as if you want to hear some immaterialist fairytale story sometimes, and then knock down anybody that takes bait. If you want to see your relations to people as some derivative of materialist flavored evolution or some cosmic holistic thing... go ahead. No bite here. Your point is what concerning person, identity, or difference? If they aren't ambiguous and we don't believe the Bee Gees, then fine, no problem. I guess you have something clear to offer. Blow our minds then :-) But you overlook that the fascists regarded the state as a superorganism so > that each person was part of the same "being", while the liberal > democracies held that individuals are the locus of values. > No. I said that identity etc is unclear. PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
