> On 09-Oct-2014, at 10:30 pm, Platonist Guitar Cowboy 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Samiya Illias <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 09-Oct-2014, at 8:06 pm, Platonist Guitar Cowboy 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Samiya Illias <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 09-Oct-2014, at 11:30 am, Stathis Papaioannou <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thursday, October 9, 2014, Samiya Illias <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> What is your position on teleology? Do you think that there is a cause 
>>>>>> or purpose for everything? 
>>>>>> Also, what do you think of this: 
>>>>>> http://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2014/08/teleology-purpose-built-universe.html
>>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does God's existence have a purpose, set by a supergod? If you're happy 
>>>>> with the idea of God not being created for a purpose, then why insist 
>>>>> that the universe is created for a purpose, and why insist that humans 
>>>>> are created for a purpose rather than (as presumably is the case with 
>>>>> God) inventing their own purpose?
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Stathis Papaioannou
>>>> 
>>>> Valid question. However, imagining the reason for God would be speculative 
>>>> at best as nobody knows anything about God, nor can we observe God. 
>>>> However, the observable universe/multiverse/creation seems to be 
>>>> purpose-built and the scripture also speaks of a purpose-built creation. 
>>>> Samiya
>>> 
>>> Concerning the goal you set yourself, of illustrating factual equivalence 
>>> of Qu'ran with scientific perspectives today, here is one, which I don't 
>>> share on many levels (a bit condescending at times, but at least he singles 
>>> out what seem to be pertinent issues), but that I can understand and relate 
>>> to on a few:
>>> 
>>> http://www.foundalis.com/rlg/Quran_and_science.htm
>>> 
>>> The very idea "factual accuracy of Qu'ran" is framed to be a major means, 
>>> and common meme in arguing for "recruitment" (propaganda danger), 
>>> something, I think we can agree, a transcendental being of any sort, 
>>> wouldn't need unless they had psychological issues and needed to see a 
>>> doctor or shaman, in which case...:-)
>>> 
>>> I hope this addresses some of your concerns as most here have little 
>>> experience with content. PGC 
>> I have read the link and see your drift. Though I disagree with the points 
>> made in it, and have addressed some of them already in my blog, however, I 
>> do not think you wish me to discuss/refute the arguments here.
> 
> My wishes are beside the matter. 
> 
> It's you that claims this kind of correctness in Qu'ran, making it the basis 
> of your reasoning and exchanges on this list and your blog, if I recall 
> correctly.
> 
> It's not even off-topic in this thread, as scientists apparently care about 
> religion as this example shows, especially when a claim to facts and valid 
> reasoning is made. Or you could start another thread. 
> 
> That would be ok. 
> 
> And no, I am not uncomfortable with you refuting arguments. Quite the 
> contrary, if it is done in a fashion that doesn't invoke faith 
> authoritatively, a discourse climate that is open to inquiry and critical 
> examination, without confusing criticism/disagreement with personal attack, 
> then no problem.
> 
> From here at least, we can verify a perspective that contrasts with yours, 
> which is better than making sense of your claims exclusively, as we are not 
> native readers, culturally. 
> 
> That is, if you care in the end about demonstrating factual accuracy in this 
> sense here, of course. PGC 
> 
Hmm. Please read this blogpost and let me know if this meets your 
'demonstrating factual accuracy in this sense here, of course.': 
http://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2014/06/dhu-al-qarnayn-polar-regions-of-earth.html?m=1
 
Samiya 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to