On 5 February 2015 at 09:19, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/4/2015 11:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 03 Feb 2015, at 20:13, Jason Resch wrote: > > I agree with John. If consciousness had no third-person observable > effects, it would be an epiphenomenon. And then there is no way to explain > why we're even having this discussion about consciousness. > > > So we all agree on this. > > > ?? Why aren't first person observable effects enough to discuss? >
I guess because if there are no third-person observable effects of consciousness, then I can't detect any other conscious entities to discuss the effects with... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
