On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:48 PM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >> Third party personal reports count just fine *PROVIDED*  you assume as
>>> I do that the Turing Test is valid
>>>
>>
>> > The Turing test is meant to test human-level intelligence, not
>> consciousness.
>>
>
> True, and most people have never even heard of the Turing Test, but every
> human being who has ever lived has implicitly assumed that if something
> behaves intelligently then it is conscious,
>

Perhaps every human, perhaps most. Who knows? The trouble is that many
things that are assumed turn out to be false: that heavier objects fall
faster, that the earth is in the center of the universe, that people in the
future all dress in white spandex, etc..


> even philosophers had no trouble with that assumption and they have
> trouble with everything. But that all changed when computers came along,
> suddenly biology chauvinists want to change the rules of the game.
>

Not me. I'm the opposite, I was always confused by the idea that rocks are
not conscious.


> > Darwin's Theory of Evolution is about the origin of biological species,
>> not consciousness.
>>
>
> Darwin's Theory of Evolution is about everything life can do, if you're
> alive and you're conscious then Evolution is responsible for both.
>

Humans apply pressure on the floor when standing up, so Evolution is
responsible for mass and gravity?


> And Evolution can see intelligence just as we can but Evolution can't see
> consciousness and neither can we except in ourselves, and yet Evolution
> produced consciousness.
>
You can make the obvious conclusion from that as easily as I can.
>
>
>> > There are more hidden assumptions here that you are not addressing.
>>
>
> List them then. I'm all ears.
>

The assumptions that consciousness is something organisms do, that
conscious is a byproduct of something, that consciousness is generated
somehow, that conscious either has an evolutionary advantage or emerges
from things that have evolutionary advantages.

Telmo.


>
>   John K Clark
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to