On Saturday, May 9, 2015, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:43:32PM +1200, LizR wrote:
> > On 8 May 2015 at 05:14, Stathis Papaioannou <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Russell Standish <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > All computational supervenience gets you is that two counterfactually
> > >> equivalent programs will generate the same conscious state. All bets
> > >> are off with counterfactually inequivalent programs that nevertheless
> > >> result  in the same physical state. For that you additionally need
> > >> physical supervenience.
> > >>
> > >> The whole business of the recording is how can that physical apparatus
> > >> replaying the conscious moment actually be conscious, when it is not
> > >> aware of the environment. As far as computationalism is concerned, the
> > >> experienced moment has already been experienced, at some previous time
> > >> and place (there and then). Replaying the recording makes no
> > >> difference whatsoever. Yet the same sequence of physical states takes
> > >> place, so in some sense by physical supervenience a new conscious
> > >> moment is created. I don't think it can be, and I don't think this is
> > >> what physical supervenience can actually mean.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Why can't playing the equivalent of a recording made de novo (i.e.
> there
> > > was no original) instantiate the conscious moment for the first time?
> > >
> >
> > Assuming a recording *can* be conscious (i.e. that the MGA's conclusion
> > isn't absurd) then of course it can be.
> >
>
> But such a recording is so large (probably consuming all the matter
> with the visible universe), how can you assert that it's consciousness
> is absurd? That is what you need to do to make the MGA work...
>

It's getting difficult to work out what everyone is claiming is and isn't
absurd.


-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to