On 24 Jun 2015, at 18:49, John Clark wrote:
ON Jun 24, 2015 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> A diary being a inanimate object doesn't notice anything.
> The diary contained the experience, like "I feel myself to be in
one city".
And it is not surprising that "you" feels that way because that was
*before * YOU WAS DUPLICATED.
No. It was asked to all copies after the dupolication. All contains
the statement "I feel myself to be in one city". That was predictable
(with P = 1) in advance.
>> And what would a third person diary be?
> The third person diary is the diary not entering in the boxes.
I don't know what that means.
See Quentin's answer. Or read the sane04 paper, or consult old posts.
> The point is that you are a believer in comp.
No, I'm a believer in computationalism.
Good.
I neither believe nor disbelieve in "comp".
What I call "comp" is a more precise, and logical weaker, version of
computationalism. All believer in computationalism believe in comp, by
definition. Put in another way, whatever consequences you extract from
comp will be derivable from computationalism.
Bruno
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
