Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 Jun 2015, at 01:27, Bruce Kellett wrote:
My main thrust all along has been to test the various logical weak
points in Bruno's argument,
Thanks for the rethorical tricks to remind us that you have fail to find
any flaw.
The flaws are that you use rhetorical tricks -- your arguments are not
valid.
and to point out where his arguments are either mere assertions, or
nothing more than pseudo-arguments, that may be motivational, but
amount to far less than proof.
Take Sane2014, and just give me the first sentence that you don't
understand. ...or of any of my other papers or post.
It is not that I don't understand -- I understand only too well. The
point is that I disagree that you have made anything like a valid
argument, or that any of your conclusions are in any way convincing.
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
