On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:13, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]
> wrote:
> I must admit that I have become frustrated by Bruno's
habit of arguing that because I do not have an alternative, fully
worked out theory, his theory must be correct ("the only game in
town" argument!).
Yes, it's silly to pretend to have the answers to all the
mysteries in the universe;
I agree so much with you.
Where would I have pretended something like that.
All what I say is that if my (generalized) brain is Turing emulable,
Aristotle metaphysics is wrong.
Then asking a machine to look inward, we get the evidence that indeed
may Plato was right.
That's all.
a good honest "I have no idea" is far far superior to a answer that
is ridiculous .
You steal the words of my mouth.
And then science consists in making only verifiable 3p statements. But
we can prove things on 1p notion, with 3p axiomatic definition of
them. The advantage of axiomatic, is that we don't need to pretend
knowing what we are talking about. We just agree on definition and laws.
Bruno
John K Clark
"I was gratified to be able to answer promptly. I said I don't
know". - Mark Twain
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
