On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Forget about giving the correct prediction, a prediction can't even be >> described by any means. Bruno thinks we can repeat the experiment and >> compile statistics from it and then compare the number obtained from >> experiment with the theoretical prediction, but who exactly was the >> prediction about? If the prediction was about >> Jason Resch >> one number is obtained, >> If the prediction >> is >> about >> the man currently experiencing Helsinki a different number is >> obtained, >> If the prediction >> was >> about >> the Moscow Man a third number is obtained, >> >> If the prediction >> was >> about >> the Washington Man yet another number is obtained, and if the >> prediction was about "you" no number at all is obtained because Bruno >> doesn't know how to give a consistent meaning to the personal pronoun "you". >> >> > > > > If I understand what you say above, your position is that the question has > no answer? >
My position is that there can't be an answer if there is no question. What *EXACTLY* is the question? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
