On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The question is why does >> >> Bruno Marchal >> absolutely >> insist >> >> on using personal pronouns even when duplication machines makes them so >> obviously ambiguous? > > > > > I don't see any ambiguity given that we have agreed that "you" meant, in > the 3p, the guy who remember Helsinki. >
To hell with this 3p crap! We agreed that "you" meant remembering being a man in Helsinki *PERIOD.* > > > And yes, in the 3p, you are in W and you are in M. But in the 1p > [blah blah] > The guy has been duplicated, there is no such thing as " *the* 1p". >> >> To complete the experiment after the duplication >> >> Bruno Marchal needs to find the person, the one unique person, who wrote >> all that stuff in the diary. > > > > > Er... ? You forget that the guy has been duplicated, > Well somebody has certainly forgotten that the guy has been duplicated, but John Clark is not the one who keeps talking about "you" and "*the* 1p" after the duplication as if there is no ambiguity. > > > I need to interview the two copies > Yes indeed. And how many cities will those two yous observe from the first person? John Clark believes the answer is 2. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
