If offered the choice between cryonics or uploading to a happy vr environment- 
as good as real life, which would you chose?

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail


-----Original Message-----
From: John Clark <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, Feb 6, 2016 01:08 PM
Subject: Re: Cryonics punched cards and the brain



<div id="AOLMsgPart_2_053ad8e4-d314-4899-af68-ad65aa019567">
<div class="aolReplacedBody"><div dir="ltr"><div class="aolmail_gmail_default" 
style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span 
style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">On Fri, Feb 5, 2016  spudboy100 via 
Everything List </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><<a 
target="_blank" 
href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>></span><span
 style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> wrote:</span>
</div><div class="aolmail_gmail_extra"><div class="aolmail_gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="aolmail_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
 <div class="aolmail_gmail_default" 
style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​> ​</div>Now, 
are there better methods for immortality, survival-wise, but its all a matter 
of opinion.<div class="aolmail_gmail_default" 
style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​​</div>There's a 
new attempt by a group of neuroscientists, that came on today, in Discovery 
magazine, that deals with non-cryogenic brain preservation. I glanced through 
the article, but, have no details on the method.</blockquote>

<div class="aolmail_gmail_default"><font size="4"><font face="arial, helvetica, 
sans-serif">​</font>That idea has been around for a long time and Alcor has 
looked into it, but as of today they don't offer it and neither does anybody 
else; and there is a reason for that. The advantage of chemically fixing the 
brain is that the long term maintenance costs are less than cryonics because 
you don't have to keep things cold, but it turns out that such costs are only 
about 25% of the total costs of cryopreserving a patient because liquid 
nitrogen is only about as expensive as milk. And it's not like a brief power 
failure will thaw out the frozen brains,  Alcor has done tests and even with 
zero power and zero maintenance their <div class="aolmail_gmail_default" 
style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">dewars are so 
well constructed that it would take about ​4 months before the brains got 
dangerously warm.</font></div><div class="aolmail_gmail_default">
</div><div class="aolmail_gmail_default"><font size="4">To chemically fix a 
brain you need osmium tetroxide and other chemicals that are very expensive, 
hard to handle, toxic and potentially dangerous to the crew doing the 
preservation unless extreme safety precautions are taken. And with Cryonics, 
unless we're talking about many millions of years, as long as things remain 
cold pretty much all the damage that is going to be done has <div 
class="aolmail_gmail_default" 
style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;display:inline">​already 
​</div>been done by the time the brain reaches liquid nitrogen temperatures. 
I'm not worried about damage caused during thawing because that won't be done 
with existing technology; the information will probably be read out by 
disassembling the brain from the outside in while it remains in solid form. I 
don't know if chemical fixation would remain as stable over the centuries as 
freezing, my hunch is that cryonics has a small edge over fixation in this 
regard but I could be dead wrong, maybe it's a big edge. And I don't want to be 
dead.  </font></div></div>
<div class="aolmail_gmail_default"><font size="4">Another advantage cold has 
over chemicals in preserving the brain is that if the distribution of 
cryo-preservative isn't completely uniform and doesn't reach certain parts of 
the brain things might not be hopeless because at least it still gets frozen, 
so you still might be able to get information out of it if your technology is 
good enough; but if the chemical fixative doesn't reach a part of the brain 
that part rots away and things are far far more serious.</font></div><div 
class="aolmail_gmail_default">
</div><div class="aolmail_gmail_default"><font size="4">Perhaps someday 
chemical fixation will improve and prove to be superior to cryonics but as of 
today Cryonics is the only option anybody offers.</font></div><div 
class="aolmail_gmail_default"><font size="4">
</font></div><div class="aolmail_gmail_default"><font size="4">  John K Clark 
</font></div><font size="4">

</font><p>
</p><blockquote class="aolmail_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to <a target="_blank" 
href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>.

To post to this group, send email to <a target="_blank" 
href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>.

Visit this group at <a target="_blank" 
href="https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list";>https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list</a>.

For more options, visit <a target="_blank" 
href="https://groups.google.com/d/optout";>https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.

</div>
</div>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to