On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> show me a computation that doesn't use matter that obeys the laws of >> physics and I'll understand it better. >> >> > > > Read the original paper by Church or Post. > I can't because all the papers I've seen are made of matter that obeys the laws of physics. > >> And I'll contact INTEL about it too. > > > > > A comment which suggests that you still want to miss the point. Intel use > physical assumption to implement physically the computers. > Then INTEL must be making a mighty good assumption because it gets the job done. If you don't make INTEL's assumption then you can't calculate 2+2. > >> >> >> >> The physical has a mathematical reason. >> > > >> > If so I have great trouble understanding why changing the physical brain > of a mathematician changes not only his > > mathematical reasoning but also his consciousness. > > > > This is weird, as this is the type of things explained the best by > Mechanism. > Yes, a physical brain produces mathematics not the other way around. Physics is more fundamental than mathematics. John K Clark > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
