On 11 Aug 2016, at 20:18, John Clark wrote:


On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

​>> ​in general it's not true that they will​ perceiving different things​, if you were the identical copy and in a symmetrical environment and facing your original the two of you would see identical things, and if your position was instantaneously exchanged with the original there would be no change in your consciousness or of that of the original, neither of you could even tell an exchange had occurred. So in that situation how could it make sense to talk of "​two different consciousnesses" when there is clearly no difference between them?

​> ​And this shows that you agree (implicitly at least) that in the step 3 case, the two identical bodies interact with quite different environment, and get their consciousness bifurcating/ differentiating.

​Well of course I agree with that! One is conscious of Moscow and the other is conscious of Washington, how could anyone say that's not a difference, how could anyone say they're still identical?

​> ​The "identical copies"

​They were once identical but after seeing different cities ​they are now nonidentical copies. And yet both are the Helsinki man. And that is why establishing a personal sense of self can only come from remembering the past and never from trying to predict the future.

​> ​could not predict the first person result of the differentiation.

​Nobody and nothing will ever be able to predict ​"THE first person result of the differentiation"


And given that we survive such duplication (assuming computationalism) all what you say in this post confirms the unavoidable existence of the First Person Indeterminacy.

"The" first person experience you will live is "the" experience, that both copies witnesses when I interview them both, on their personal experience, using my mobile phone, after their reconstitution. QED.

Bruno




because after differentiation "THE first person result of the differentiation" is pure triple distilled extra virgin 100% gibberish. Nobody will ever be able to predict "sjhfhzbawhfd" either.


 John K Clark


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to