## Advertising

On 3/6/2018 5:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

On 6 Mar 2018, at 01:37, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net<mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:On 3/5/2018 9:14 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:"Could" implies a question about possibilities. It's certainly logically possible that there not be such a disease as leukemia. Is it nomologically possible?...not as far as we know.Well I'm not sure it's logically possible, for the reasons that Bruno already addressed.Bruno is assuming that everything not contrary to his theory existsaxiomatically…?which is assuming the answer.?I recall that my assumption is only that the physical brain can beemulated at some level by a digital physical machine so that we wouldsurvive in the usual sense.Then to just define “digital” we need to accept "very elementaryarithmetic" (like RA), but then, it is just impossible to use anassumption of primary physicalness to select the computations inarithmetic. We need to select it by the measure on the first personexperiences, and this gives the first coherent explanation of bothconsciousness and matter appearance, where physicists just do notaddress this question since a long time.

`Not just "accept arithmetic", but also to suppose that all possible`

`computations exist via a UD.`

Brent

My work says nothing about physics, but it shows that with DigitalMechanism _in *Metaphysics_*, physicalism does not work.Bruno

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.