> On 21 Aug 2018, at 02:53, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:20:19PM -0700, Brent Meeker wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/20/2018 11:42 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>    When we assume compationalism. Yes. In that case consciousness is
>>    associated with a digital self-referential entity which cannot distinguish
>>    a “bottom” (primary) physical reality from an arithmetical reality
>> 
>> 
>> But you didn't show that. 
> 
> This is directly the result at step 7 of the UDA. And it is pretty much 
> required for the Church Turing thesis to hold. Of course, step 7 relies on 
> robustness of the *-verse, for which step 8 is the remedy.
> 
> But already, I believe the *-verse must be robust, as otherwise quantum 
> computing supremacy will never work. Empirical support of this contention is 
> due real soon now™. So I suspect step 8 could well be consigned to the 
> dustbin of history...
> 
>> You only showed that it would be true if the digital
>> entity were immersed in an environment.  You argued that the environment 
>> could
>> also be digital...but the doctor couldn't provide that.  But then your 
>> argument
>> fails.  You've only shown that the digital entity can exist in a digital
>> environment consisting of digital matter (including the entities digital
>> brain).  So you've just replicated the world except you've appended "digital"
>> in front of every noun and relation.  If everything is digital, then digital
>> matter may be primary in this digital world.  The adjective "digital" has 
>> lost
>> it's metaphysical significance...unless you can derive some observable
>> consequence of "digital".
>> 
> 
> This is a critique of step 8 (the MGA), which curryfies the environment into 
> the computation. My money's on robustness being empirically confirmed in the 
> next few decades…

I would say that the robustness has never cease to be confirmed. It is what we 
live everyday. But to solve the mind-body problem, we have to explain that 
robustness by the “many-dreams internal interpretation of 
arithmetic/combinator/…”.

Bruno



> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr Russell Standish                    Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Principal, High Performance Coders
> Visiting Senior Research Fellow        [email protected]
> Economics, Kingston University         http://www.hpcoders.com.au
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to