On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 5:49 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
> *>Information processing can ultimately lead to just a type of > intelligence: pseudo-intelligence:* > *Artificial intelligence isn't synthetic intelligence: It's > pseudo-intelligence.* > If you're outsmarted by a pseudo-intelligence how are you better off than if you were outsmarted by a genuine-intelligence? > > Consciousness requires experience processing in addition to information > processing. > A experience is information so experience processing is information processing, and I don't see how it makes any difference if the brain doing the processing is dry and hard or wet and squishy. And If consciousness is required for intelligence and computers don't have it why do we find new tasks every day that computers can do in a smarter way than we can? John K Clark > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
