On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 6:02:50 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 5:49 PM Philip Thrift <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > >> *>Information processing can ultimately lead to just a type of >> intelligence: pseudo-intelligence:* >> *Artificial intelligence isn't synthetic intelligence: It's >> pseudo-intelligence.* >> > > If you're outsmarted by a pseudo-intelligence how are you better off than > if you were outsmarted by a genuine-intelligence? > > >> > Consciousness requires experience processing in addition to >> information processing. >> > > A experience is information so experience processing is information > processing, and I don't see how it makes any difference if the brain doing > the processing is dry and hard or wet and squishy. And If consciousness is > required for intelligence and computers don't have it why do we find new > tasks every day that computers can do in a smarter way than we can? > > John K Clark > > >
If experience (Galen Strawson, *The Subject of Experience*) is the result of information (only) processing, then the argument for arithmetical (Platonic) reality holds. - pt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
