> On 20 Dec 2018, at 20:37, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 12/20/2018 2:09 AM, Jason Resch wrote: >> >> How is it imaginary if they later confirm it? i.e., they wait 1 year, and >> compare their readings from telescopes of things 1 ly away from them, and >> when they compare notes each one confirms that indeed their presents >> contained a different set of objects on that day 1 year ago when they >> crossed paths. > > If there was an event one light year away in one of their's "present" at the > time they passed, the other will not agree that it was in his "present" at > that moment. But they will agree on the event and it's causal relation to > other events...which is why physicsts don't assign any significance to these > subjective "presents”.
Which is good methodology in physics, but a non-sense in metaphysics, or they need to eliminate consciousness or Mechanism. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
