On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:03 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 29 Apr 2019, at 18:03, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > where S4Grz (the logic of []p & p) obeys to a logic of (temporal) > knowledge of an unnameable subject. The first consider the second as > mysterious, the second knows, but cannot justify it through words or any > representation. > > > "The unnamable is the eternally real. > > > OK. I would have put it like “the eternally real is unnamable. > > > This exchange made me think of this: http://taotechingdaily.com/1-the-eternal-tao/ "The Tao that can be told is not the Eternal Tao. The name that can be named is not the Eternal Name." Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
