How is he coherent with you if he is aware of non-computable phenomenon, while you are oblivious ?
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 11:11:50 UTC+3, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 31 May 2019, at 14:13, 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > But you just said in another post that you are familiar with Roger Penrose > writing about non-computational phenomena. How do you reconcile > non-computational phenomena with computationalism ? > > > Despite his non valid use of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, Penrose is > coherent with my reasoning. He believes in primitive matter and reject > mechanism. I keep mechanism and reject materialism. My simpler result > staring the whole thing is that Mechanism and Materialism are incompatible. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/23d9580f-d5e4-482b-9460-91edc7fbb5b9%40googlegroups.com.
