> On 8 Jun 2020, at 19:25, Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 10:29:34 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
> 
> 
> On Monday, June 8, 2020 at 6:26:10 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
>> On 7 Jun 2020, at 17:56, Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com <>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 9:00:46 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>> It predicts everything, so it predicts nothing. AG
>> 
>> It's not unlike the monkey typing at random and coming up with Shakespeare's 
>> plays, or the Bible. AG 
> 
> Using this analogy, it is more like the monkey typing *all* books. Except 
> that the monkey is elementary arithmetic, and there is non need of randomness 
> at that stage, and also, the books are not books, but true (semantic) 
> relations implementing computations, and then physics is shown to be an 
> internal measure, isolated from the Göde-Löb-Solvay theorem in the 
> mathematics iff self-reference.
> 
> The theory is Kxy = x together with Sxyz = xz(yz), as I have explained a year 
> ago.
> 
> The theology is the modal logics G and G*, and the intensional (modal) 
> variants imposed by incompleteness, and all that is justified without using 
> more than the two axioms above. 
> 
> “My” theory is a sub theory of al scientific theories. 
> 
> Look at the conceptual progresses even just on physics:
> 
> Bohr:
>       - the wave equation (full arithmetic + analysis)
>       - a dualist unintelligible theory of mind.
> 
> Everett
>       - the wave equation (full arithmetic + analysis)
>       - Mechanism
> 
> Your servitor:
>       - arithmetic (a tiny part of arithmetic)
>       - Mechanism.
> 
> If “my" theory (which is actually a theorem showing that “my” theory is the 
> Universal machine theory) predicts everything, then all theories predict 
> everything.
> 
> I suspect that you have not really try to understand the theory. It is not 
> mine, it is the theory that any patient being can derive from mechanism and 
> computer science/arithmetic. The hard work have already be done by Gödel, 
> Kleene, Löb, and others. Two key theorems which summarise a lot are the two 
> theorem by Solovay, which summarise the theology of the machine in one modal 
> logic G*. Such question or read the papers if you want to really address the 
> “mechanist mind-body problem”.
> 
> Bruno
> 
> I am not motivated to study your theory. If all computation are possible, it 
> seems to imply, for example, that any G describes a possible Newtonian 
> gravity law, but can't tell is which G corresponds to our universe, let alone 
> show that Newton's law is just a weak field approximation of GR. AG 
> 
> Also, I don't believe that logic alone, with the postulates of arithmetic, 
> can distinguish one G from another, to obtain the weak field approximation of 
> GR, aka Newtonian gravity; or that the measured velocity of light is 
> independent of the motions of source and recipient. AG 


You seem to assume a physical reality. That’s all good for doing physics, but 
cannot work when doing mechanist metaphysics. With Mechanism, invoking an 
ontological commitment is no more available. You would need to explain how it 
would make possible to distinguish the arithmetical and the physical reality 
from introspection only, which is not possible when we assume digital 
mechanism. Eventually, you might understand that there are no evidence for a 
primary physical universe (primary = in need to be assumed and not explainable 
from something non physical).

Bruno 





> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to everyth...@googlegroups.com <>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/42839686-3300-4fb6-bc61-987be7103c1ao%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/42839686-3300-4fb6-bc61-987be7103c1ao%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5926c4b1-b2bf-4eaa-9b6d-1074b53534eeo%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5926c4b1-b2bf-4eaa-9b6d-1074b53534eeo%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/DF852A33-4335-47E6-9249-C8503E74F39B%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to