Why not assume the wf applies only before the measurement? Or why not withhold judgement on a phenomenon not yet understood? Instead you totally dismiss empirical evidence that no one ever observes a split. AG
On Friday, January 15, 2021 at 1:18:53 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:22 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> *> Why do you assume that the initial observer splits after initial trial >> when it's not observed? AG * > > > For heaven sake haven't you been listening?! Because that is the least > bizarre interpretation anybody can think of to explain the utterly bizarre > results observed from the two slit experiment. There is just no getting > around it, if Many Worlds isn't true then something even stranger must be. > > > John K Clark > >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2a6bf029-a37a-4049-ab90-0ee889ba9820n%40googlegroups.com.
