For brevity's sake there is an ultimate essence I'd day based on the articles I 
have read, there is a basic essence to physics of the cosmos and that appears 
to be quantum field theory, not particles, fields, or the field. 
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-mystery-at-the-heart-of-physics-that-only-math-can-solve-20210610/QFT
 seems to satisfy the essence of this contention. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Tomas Pales <[email protected]>
To: Everything List <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Aug 30, 2021 3:52 pm
Subject: Re: there is no ultimate essence


On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:51:32 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
 
 In other words eternally at a particular time.  Is there any reason I should 
take that seriously?

And how would you like to take it? According to theory of relativity time is a 
kind of space. 
 
  Any two things form a pair, why would anyone need to "nominate" them as a 
pair.  
 
 Being two things, or even one thing, is a conceptualization about the world.


All things are there. Just because you pick one or two of them doesn't mean 
they are your conceptualization. -- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6a4af469-b17a-4631-bf76-3647ffdc5265n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1024999251.754871.1630370007533%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to