On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 1:51:01 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote: > > > On 8/30/2021 12:52 PM, Tomas Pales wrote: > > > On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:51:32 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote: > >> >> In other words eternally at a particular time. Is there any reason I >> should take that seriously? >> > > And how would you like to take it? According to theory of relativity time > is a kind of space. > > > So my house here is exists everywhere? >
No, by "eternally" I didn't mean everywhere in the time dimension but without passage of time. There is no passage of time just as there is no passage of space. > Are they. Here's two photons. If I interchange them I have the same > state. Here's two golf balls. If I interchange them I have different > state. Here's a member of the tennis team and a member of the band. I > can't interchange them...because they are the same person. It's seems to > me that my conceptualization makes a lot of difference in how things map > onto the natural numbers. > Just because two objects are the same doesn't mean they are one object. They are differentiated from each other by their position in reality (by their relations to other objects). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/33bba809-8555-4494-810c-eb19d48495f9n%40googlegroups.com.
